Home / Research Library / Conducting proportional meta-analysis in different...
🤖 Artificial Intelligence OpenAlex

Conducting proportional meta-analysis in different types of systematic reviews: a guide for synthesisers of evidence

📅 September 20, 2021 👤 Timothy Hugh Barker, Celina Borges Migliavaca, Cinara Stein et al. 📖 BMC Medical Research Methodology 📊 721 citations

🤖 Plain-English Summary

BACKGROUND: Single group data present unique challenges for synthesises of evidence. We provide worked examples of how proportional meta-analyses have been conducted in research syntheses previously and consider the methods, statistical considerations, and presentation of this technique.

🔑 Key Findings

  • Proportional meta-analysis is becoming an increasingly common technique employed for the synthesis of single group data.
  • Proportional meta-analysis shares many similarities with the conduct and reporting of comparative, or pairwise, meta-analysis.
  • While robust and comprehensive methods exist detailing how researchers can conduct a meta-analysis that compares two (or more) groups against a common intervention, there is a scarcity of methodological guidance available to assist synthesisers of evidence in the conduct, interpretation, and importance of proportional meta-analysis in systematic reviews.

💡 Why This Matters

This research advances how AI systems learn, reason, and solve problems — with direct implications for automation and scientific discovery.

Read the full paper
Access the original peer-reviewed research via OpenAlex.

View on DOI ↗

📋 Article Details

Category 🤖 Artificial Intelligence
Published Sep 20, 2021
Journal BMC Medical Research Methodology
Authors Timothy Hugh Barker, Celina Borges Migliavaca, Cinara Stein, Verônica Colpani, Maicon Falavigna
DOI 10.1186/s12874-021-01381-z
Citations 721
Source OpenAlex

More 🤖 Artificial Intelligence Research